|
|
本帖最后由 ywy 于 2013-8-6 12:46 编辑
刚做了Pest Inspection，因为时间太紧没有太多选择就随便选了一家做，我也不懂，看的还都ok吧，因为签的合同时subject pest inspection的，麻烦大家帮我看看报告有什么要注意的地方？先谢过啦
1.GENERAL
1.1 Brief Description of Building (e.g. single storey house; split-level townhouse; multistorey apartment).
Single storey townhouse
Primary Method of Construction (e.g. timber stumps and timber framed; steel framed; concrete; brick).
Floor Structure:
Concrete floor
Wall Structure:
Brick
Roof Structure:
Timber framed [Karri]
Timber Secondary and Finishing Elements of Construction:
Wood finishing elements
1.3 Occupancy Status Was the building occupied, vacant, furnished, partly furnished or unfurnished?
Furnished
1.4 Orientation To establish the way in which the property was viewed.
The fa?ade of the building faces (e.g. northeast):
South by the carport
NOTE. For the purpose of this report the fa?ade of the building contains the main entrance door.
2. ACCESSIBILITY See also Clause A.2.
2.1 Readily Accessible Areas Inspected The inspection covered the following Readily Accessible Areas including:
[ x ] Building Interior [ x ] Building Exterior [ x ] Roof Exterior
[ x ] Roof Space [ - ] Subfloor Space [ x ] Outbuildings
[ x ] The site including any timber structures such as bridges, landscaping, retaining walls, fences, tree stumps, trees and timber embedded in the soil within the property boundaries up to a distance of 50 metres of the building.
Comments: AS AREAS NOT INSPECTED.
2.2 Areas Not Inspected: The inspection did not include areas which were not readily accessible, inaccessible or obstructed at the time of inspection. Cavity walls, under furniture, under insulation and behind inside timbers.
Were there any obstructions that may conceal possible timber pest attack? See also Clause A.1 - Limitation No. 3 & Item 2.3.
[ x ] Building Interior (e.g. floor coverings):
Under floor coverings, under furniture and behind inside timbers not inspected.
[ x ] Building Exterior (e.g. stored articles] Remove mulches and soil from house edge
[ - ] Roof Exterior (e.g. vegetation): N/A
[ x ] Roof Space (e.g. thermal insulation): The roof has large batt insulation not inspected under this item, but inspected inner roof edges and rafters as much as possible and no termites found.
[ - ] Subfloor Space (e.g. pipe/duct work): N/A
[ x ] Outbuildings (e.g. wall linings): Storeroom is full of items not fully inspected
[ - ] Site (e.g. vegetation covering tree stumps or fences): N/A
Comments: THESE AREAS ARE NOT READILY ACCESSIBLE OR OBSTRUCTED.
Were there any normally accessible areas which did not permit entry? (e.g. the laundry was locked; there was no visible means of access to the subfloor space; the small size of the existing entry aperture did not allow for bodily access to the roof space). See also Item 2.3. N/A
2.3 Undetected Timber Pest Risk Assessment Due to the level of accessibility for inspection including the presence of obstructions, the overall degree of risk of undetected timber pest attack and conditions conducive to timber pest attack was considered: Moderate.
RECOMMENDATION: Where the risk is considered “Moderate” or “Moderate-High” or “High”, a further inspection is strongly recommended of areas that were not readily accessible, and of inaccessible or obstructed areas once access has been provided or the obstruction removed. This may require the moving, lifting or removal of obstructions such as floor coverings, furniture, stored items foliage and insulation. In some instances, it may also require the removal of ceiling and wall linings, and the cutting of traps and access holes. For further advice consult your Timber Pest Detection Consultant.
Comments: N/A
3. TERMITES See also Clause A.3 and Clause A.8.
The genus or species of drywood or subterranean termites listed below have the potential to cause significant structural damage (see also Clause A.1 - Limitations No 4 & No 5).
3.1 Active (live) Termites
Were live termites found? NO (If “Yes” continue. If “No” go to Item 3.2).
Was a termite nest found? NO (If “Yes” state details and location below).
Have any specimens been collected for the purpose of positive identification? N/A.
?????
The genus or species has been positively identified as:
[ ] Coptotermes (where possible, identify species and give details below) [ ] Schedorhinotermes
[ ] Nasutitermes exitiosus [ ] Heterotermes ferox [ ] Mastotermes darwiniensis
[ ] Cryptotermes species [ ] Other (explain) [ ] Undetermined (explain)
Details & location of live termites found (include any recommendation for further expert advice):
N/A
3.2 Subterranean Termite Management Proposal A proposal in accordance with Australian Standard AS 3660.2 to treat a known infestation and/or help manage the risk of concealed subterranean termite access to buildings and structures.
Is a Subterranean Termite Management Proposal recommended? YES
Is the Consultant engaged to provide a management proposal? NO.
Recommend, more termite inspections for early detection in the near future.
If “Yes”, in addition to this inspection report, a full written Subterranean Termite Management Proposal in accordance with Australian Standard AS 3660.2 must be delivered to the Client (see also Clause A.1 – Exclusion No.1).
IMPORTANT NOTE. If this Consultant is not providing a management proposal, but a proposal is recommended above, then the Client should contact a licensed pest control operator in respect to obtaining a proposal without delay.
3.3 Termite Workings and/or Damage
Was evidence of termite workings or damage found? NO (If “Yes” continue. If “No” go to Items 3.4.)
The extent of any visible damage appears: N/A
Indicate the location of all accessible timbers and other materials showing signs of attack, and a description of any termite workings found: N/A
RECOMMENDATION Where evidence of damage to building timbers exists, competent advice (e.g. from a licensed or registered building contractor) should be obtained to determine the extent of any structural damage and as to the need or otherwise for rectification or repair work. See also Item 3.5 ‘Frequency of Future Inspections’ recommendation.
3.4 Previous Termite Management Program
Was evidence of a possible previous termite management program noted? (If “Yes” provide details and location including the location of any ‘Termite Treatment Notice’ affixed at the entrance to a crawl space or some other place where it was protected from damage, e.g. in the case of a slab-on-ground construction, in an external electrical meter box). YES
The meter box has a sticker, so retain certificates of treatments if possible from the vendor so you
have a house history on termite treatments as last termite barrier was done 2006 by the sticker
3.5 Frequency of Future Inspections Australian Standard AS 3660 recognises that regular inspections will not prevent
termite attack, but may help in the detection of termite activity. Early detection will allow remedial treatment to be commenced
sooner and damage to be minimised.
The next inspection to help detect termite attack is recommended in:
3 months
4. CHEMICAL DELIGNIFICATION See also Clause A.4.
Was evidence of Chemical Delignification found? NO (If “Yes” continue. If “No” go to Item 5.)
The extent of any visible damage appears: .
Details & location (include any recommendations for further expert advice e.g. from a licensed building contractor):
N/A
5. FUNGAL DECAY See also Clause A.5.
Was evidence of Fungal Decay found? NO (If “Yes” continue. If “No” go to Item 6.)
The condition of the timber appears: N/A
The extent of any visible damage appears: N/A
Details & location (include any recommendations for further expert advice e.g. from a licensed building contractor):
N/A
6. WOOD BORERS See also Clause A.6.
Was evidence of Wood Borers found? NO (If “Yes” continue. If “No” go to Item 7.)
The Wood Borer is believed to be: .
The extent of any visible damage appears: .
Details & location (include any recommendations for further expert advice e.g. from a licensed building contractor):
On accessible areas only none found
7. CONDITIONS CONDUCIVE TO TIMBER PEST ATTACK See also Clause A.7.
The Timber Pest Detection Consultant sought evidence of noticeable building deficiencies or environmental factors that may contribute to the presence of timber pests.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATION Where evidence of Conditions Conducive to Timber Pest Attack exists, competent advice (e.g. from a licensed or registered building contractor or plumbing contractor) should be obtained in regard to removing any condition conducive to timber pest attack and as to the need or otherwise for rectification or repair work.
7.1 Lack of Adequate Subfloor Ventilation
Was evidence of a lack of adequate subfloor ventilation found? NO (If “Yes or Undetermined” provide details & location):
7.2 The Presence of Excessive Moisture
Prevailing weather conditions at the time of inspection: DRY
Was evidence of the presence of excessive moisture found? NO (If “Yes or Undetermined” provide details & location)
Checked by moisture meter
MOULD RECOMMENDATION Where evidence of mould growth was noted above, there may be environmental, biological or health issues associated with this report. Any questions concerning such issues due to the presence of mould, the release of mould spores or concerning indoor air quality should be directed to appropriately qualified inspector. See also Clause A.1 – Limitation No 7.
7.3 Bridging or Breaching of Termite Barriers and Inspection Zones ‘Bridging’ is the spanning of a termite barrier or inspection zone so that subterranean termites are provided with passage over or around that barrier. ‘Breaching’ is the making of a hole or gap in a termite barrier so that termites are provided with a passage through that barrier.
Was the finished ground or paving level above the adjacent internal floor level or damp-proof-course or obstructing any weephole or vent face on external walls?
NO (If “Yes or Undetermined” explain below).
Was evidence of bridging or breaching including the condition insufficient slab edge exposure found?
YES If “Yes or Undetermined” explain below – include any visible evidence of bridging or breaching or slab edges obstructed by:
[ ] Carports [ ] Verandahs [ ] Steps/Ramps [ ] Trellis/Fences
[ ] Cladding [ ] Pipework [ x ] Paths/Paving [ ] Driveways
[ x ] Earth [ X ] Landscaping [ x ] Additional Slabs [ ] Other (explain)
Details & Location:
The house edge was not exposed not inspected
7.4 Untreated or Non-Durable Timber Used in a Hazardous Environment This condition may include, but is not limited to, earth-wood or damp masonry-wood contact.
Was evidence of untreated or non-durable timber used in a hazardous environment found?
NO (If “Yes or Undetermined” provide details & location): N/A
Other Conditions Conducive to Timber Pest Attack For example: evidence of non-existent or defective termite shields installed to isolate piers; storage of timber and stored goods under/adjacent to the building; tree stumps and vegetation in subfloor spaces; cracks in concrete slabs or foundations; defective flashings, downpipes and guttering; etc.
Was evidence of any other condition conducive to timber pest attack found? YES (If “Yes or Undetermined” provide details & location): As areas not inspected
8. RISK MANAGEMENT OPTIONS See Clause A.8.
9. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
There was no visible sign of active termites on the house on accessible areas only, this means that timber pest areas with no report are under concrete, inaccessible areas, cavity walls, and behind inside timbers these area could be not inspected. Also retain paper work from the vendor of termite treatments as meter box has a sticker for last termite barrier. Overall this home has obstructions and inaccessible areas that was not inspected as in this report. If that is wanted then the owner must remove all obstructions and make accessible all areas that are not accessible for more inspections. Also was checked with instruments on accessible areas only. |
上一篇：弱问 加建预算下一篇：悉尼地区寻找broker
|
雷达卡
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
千斤顶
