关于特定职业新州担保问题及Pro rata-来自移民部的最新解释

新城国际 · 发表于 2013-8-16 16:46:58

Responses provided by Director, SkillSelect:
To provide some background information on occupational ceilings, I confirm that they were introduced on 1 July 2012 as part of the package of reform of Australia’s skilled migration program, which included the introduction of SkillSelect, the creation of new visa subclasses and changes to visa processing systems to provide for e-lodgement of all applications.  Occupational ceilings were designed to limit the number of invitations issued via SkillSelect for each occupational group in the general skilled migration program.  They are intended to ensure that the program is not dominated by a narrow range of occupations which could potentially crowd out local job seekers in these areas.
Once an occupational ceiling has been reached, no further invitations for that occupation can be issued for the remainder of the program year.  However, occupational ceilings do not apply to employer sponsored visas so specific skill shortages can still be filled through the employer sponsored program, even if the relevant ceiling has been reached.  Occupational ceilings are set based upon advice from the Australia Workforce Productivity Agency (AWPA) and other Federal agencies such as Treasury and DEEWR.  The ceilings are set at six per cent of the stock number of workers in each occupational group, representing the average figure for replacement demand (that is, replacing workers who have left the workforce) and new job growth.
In 2012-13, the following six occupational groups reached their occupational ceilings which meant no intending migrants in occupations in these groups could be nominated or invited to apply for a visa until the ceilings were reset on 1 July 2013:
Occupational Group
ANZSCO Code
Chemical & Material Engineers
2331
ICT Business & System Analysts
2611
Electronics Engineers
2334
Telecomm Engineering Professionals
2633
Other Engineering Professionals
2339
Software and Applications Programmers
2613
In the first month of the 2013-14 program year, a significant proportion of available places were again used up for these six occupational groups and it was determined that the ceilings would again be met, but even earlier than in the previous program year.  Based on the high numbers of Expressions of Interest (EOIs) being submitted for these occupational groups, the decision was therefore made to move to a pro rata allocation of the remaining places to allow limited numbers of the most highly skilled workers in these occupations to apply for a visa throughout 2013-14.  In discussions with states and territories, they have suggested alternative approaches in order to allow state and territory nominations for these occupations as well as invitations for skilled independent migrants and we are currently working with them to develop an acceptable solution which will allow both independent skilled and state and territory nominated migrants from these occupational groups for the remainder of the 2013?14 program year.
I would emphasise that there will be no change to the total number of places available for these six occupational groups under their occupational ceilings.  The focus is on ensuring that the limited remaining places in these occupational groups are not exhausted early in the year.  The situation outlined in the email below (ie: having no one from these occupational groups being able to be invited for 11 months) is exactly what we have been trying to avoid and if the current limitations had not been introduced by DIAC, some occupational ceilings would have already been reached and the others would be very close to being reached.  When the new arrangement with the states and territories is finalised, it will be announced in the updated invitation round report on the SkillSelect website (www.immi.gov.au/skills/skillselect/) and information about the specific cut off points scores for these occupational groups under the new arrangements will also be included in this report.
Kind regards,
Grace Turner
Secretariat
NSW Client Reference Group
Department of Immigration and Citizenship

miuxiaoniu · 发表于 2013-8-16 19:00:16

本帖最后由 keira09 于 2013-8-16 19:17 编辑
不错等把2613的工作经验分扣完了我也搞到65了移民局刀快点否则考到四个7的It留学生都滚蛋会计读py反而不需要四个7 澳洲的公平哪里体现

keira09 · 发表于 2013-8-16 19:14:44

LS的2B施主请自行滚粗。变态心理，自己拿不到还不让别人拿到。与其抱怨不如提高自己才是硬道理。

xukegenius · 发表于 2013-8-16 20:46:41

LS说的确实有点强硬，PY花了1W刀10个月才5分，4个7有10分，前者还是有经济贡献的，本身公平性我觉得还是得到保证了的。

zys924 · 发表于 2013-8-16 20:59:19

本帖最后由 keira09 于 2013-8-16 22:23 编辑

xukegenius 发表于 2013-8-16 20:46
LS的2B施主请自行滚粗。变态心理，自己拿不到还不让别人拿到。与其抱怨不如提高自己才是硬道理。
我拿不到，就是被你这样的"高手”抢走了我的东西。呵呵，你不是华人破公司的小会计，又要读Py又要读翻译吧。去年EOI你们吓的发抖的时候忘了吗，目前得势了就得瑟了吗，华人小会计拿着最低工资的“PR"，你们上课读书读的什么玩意，天天混混，考试之前突击一下就过了，只配做底层。会计这个烂专业年年要说要被踢的，反而现在稳妥妥的，哈哈，不愧是澳洲大学的摇钱树，有免死金牌，照样忽悠留学生来读，读好以后做澳洲最光荣的蓝领

keira09 · 发表于 2013-8-16 21:49:04

本帖最后由 keira09 于 2013-8-16 21:51 编辑

zys924 发表于 2013-8-16 20:59
LS说的确实有点强硬，PY花了1W刀10个月才5分，4个7有10分，前者还是有经济贡献的，本身公平性我觉得还是得 ...
用钱来衡量贡献，不错啊，那么offshore全部滚吧，留学生工薪家长又付得起学费又付得起首付，官商二代更是一来就是好房好车好马子全部搞定，这次offshore死定了

keira09 · 发表于 2013-8-16 21:50:12

keira09 发表于 2013-8-16 21:49
我拿不到，就是被你这样的"高手”抢走了我的东西。呵呵，你不是华人破公司的小会计，又要读Py又要读翻译 ...
会计一旦被拿下，澳洲大学的商学院75%肯定倒闭，这，就是硬道理！商学院会计课程有一定含金量的的确少之又少，会计泛滥不好找工作也是事实，但你的确是个土鳖也还说得过去。
拿到PR的会计毕业生没有功夫搭理你这IT的土鳖怎么看，相反人家会用另一个金融专业的成绩单（对了，商学院有个double major，你不知道吧亲）去找工作，当然这也与你无关。
在我们眼里倒是看不出蓝领和金领的区别，相反，看到的是你那横眉怒目和血盆大口，思考着为何别人把标准定得那么“低”。
嘘，很晚了，亲，网上有剑桥雅思9的完整PDF，为了4个8，快去下载吧，亲！