澳洲码农面试中，算法问得多吗？

很明显.

adu 发表于 2014-2-28 14:06

其实考这些来招人的公司根本不了解当今 developer 如何工作，想这样招人倒不如看看他们相关科目大大学考 ...
什么样的工作，找什么样的developer，copy paste工作就找copy paste的developer

一起去看海.

主要简历水分太多，我们公司面试的人，比这还简单的题目，还要近一半的是做不出来。

yangwulong1978.

我那时候面试个阿 three 的时候，，他很能说，，我丢给他一个RED-BLACK TREE 算法，，他就闭嘴了，
其实我自己写都写不对，，，

shixiawg.

很明显 发表于 2014-2-28 13:53

小题写完就该能compile，一点都不能错
你这bug就至少3个，每个都vital，加上多余的variable ...
A nice person would simply say:
you forgot to put 'return result'.
AND for godness sake, you use a bloody IDE in real work.
Any IDE will indicate that there is an unused boolean variable.
AND where is this third bug you are talking about?
AND why should this piece of code I wrote for fun have to work???
I thought we are discussing algorithm here.
Real work is different from University where you have to write code on a piece of paper and it just can't be wrong.
Get out of Uni and do some work.

很明显.

shixiawg 发表于 2014-2-28 14:44

A nice person would simply say:
you forgot to put 'return result'.
这种小破题，面试都是白板/白纸写
功底差别灰心，慢慢来，知耻而后勇

很明显.

shixiawg 发表于 2014-2-28 14:44

A nice person would simply say:
you forgot to put 'return result'.
看了这么长时间，这么多明显的bug都看不到，好像IDE也帮不了你了

很明显.

shixiawg 发表于 2014-2-28 14:44

A nice person would simply say:
you forgot to put 'return result'.
水平差就谦虚点，这么烂已经不是for fun能解释的了

honester.

自己写代码的程序员都是傻子，上网干嘛用的，自己写错误多还不稳定
利用已有经验才是正确的

很明显.

果然人才济济

kawara.

那个题真的不能称为算法题，只能说是一段小程序，看看你基本功